With the continual stream of information and images flooding past me each day, I’ve come to appreciate the rare, found gems that stop me in my virtual tracks. This week it was the above photograph of wooden chairs piled between two buildings that caught my eye on a friend’s Facebook page and sent me on a pleasurable hunt for more details.
Doris Salcedo’s haunting artwork Shibboleth, a giant crack installed in the floor of the Tate Modern’s Turbine Hall, brought the Colombian artist well-deserved attention in 2007. But most of us are less familiar with her earlier projects, such as her 2003 chair piece titled Installation for the 8th Istanbul Biennale.

Salcedo's idea was to create a "topography of war"--not tied to a specific historical event, but to war in general. Seeing these 1,550 wooden chairs piled high between two buildings in central Istanbul, I'm reminded of mass graves. Of anonymous victims. I think of both chaos and absence, two effects of wartime violence.

Chairs are an intriguing choice, because they have the power to communicate both absence and human connection. Amassing them in huge quantities is not only visually spectacular, but it also conveys individual experience, as well as the collective.
Like Shibboleth, Istanbul is simple in its concept, but powerful in its impact. Salcedo’s idea was to create a “topography of war”–not tied to a specific historical event, but to war in general. Seeing these 1,550 wooden chairs piled high between two buildings in central Istanbul, I’m reminded of mass graves. Of anonymous victims. I think of both chaos and absence, two effects of wartime violence.
Born in 1958 in Bogotá, Colombia, Salcedo’s installations express the silenced lives of the marginalized. She is particularly interested in the gap between the powerful and the powerless, and in victims of violence and forced migration. “I am a Third World artist,” says Salcedo. Her artwork emerges “from that perspective—from the perspective of the victim, from the perspective of the defeated.”
“What I’m trying to get out of these pieces is that element that is common in all of us,” Salcedo explains. “And in a situation of war, we all experience it in much the same way, either as victim or perpetrator. So I’m not narrating a particular story. I’m just addressing experiences.”
According to Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones, Salcedo once witnessed “a horrific clash between guerrillas and the state that ended in people being burned to death in the occupied Palace of Justice in Bogotá: ‘It left its mark on me. I began to conceive of works based on nothing.’ Her response was to go to a hospital in Bogotá and collect dead patients’ discarded shoes, which she put into cavities dug in a wall and veiled in a weblike fibre.”
Jones makes the excellent point that Salcedo’s approach to art is not to give form to the voices of the powerless, but to take form away:
“To give form is an act of power. There is no art more involved with power than architecture because nothing says as clearly as a building that ‘I had the power to build this.’ Surely it’s no coincidence that women such as Salcedo and

Doris Salcedo, "Atrabiliarios," 1996, MoMA Collection (Image courtesy pathetica.net). These shoes once belonged to people who have since disappeared amid the political violence in Doris Salcedo's native Colombia. Salcedo's approach to art is not to give form to the voices of the powerless, but to take form away.

Salcedo's "Shibboleth" at the Tate Modern was filled in when the exhibition closed, but the scar is still visible in Turbine Hall. You can see photos of the scar in my article on the Tate here at Gwarlingo (Photo by Lefteris Pitarakis courtesy the AP)

Doris Salcedo, "Istanbul Project II," 2003 Piezo-pigment on Hahnemühle German Etching Paper, 24 1/2 x 37 1/4 inches. Edition of 35 (Photo by Bill Orcutt. © Doris Salcedo. Courtesy the Alexander and Bonin, New York)

Doris Salcedo, "Installation at 8th International Istanbul Biennial," 2003. (Photo by Muammer Yanmaz. © Doris Salcedo. Courtesy the Alexander and Bonin, New York)
Four years after Salcedo’s installation in Istanbul, another artist, Chinese dissident Ai Weiwei, used chairs to memorable effect in his piece Fairytale, a work that explores Chinese displacement. In 2007 Ai installed a set of 1001 Ming and Qing dynasty chairs at Documenta 12 in Kassel, Germany, one chair for each of the 1001 Chinese travelers that the artist also brought to Germany.
Seeing Ai’s work and Salcedo’s here side-by-side makes me ponder something I’ve never considered before: the chair as raw sculptural material. Chairs are an intriguing choice, because they have the power to communicate both absence and human connection. Amassing them in huge quantities is not only visually spectacular, but it also conveys individual experience, as well as the collective.
After taking a closer look at Salcedo’s work, I’ll be eager to see what she comes up with next. If you want to learn more about Salcedo’s art, you can check out these videos and images from PBS’s Art 21. In this Art 21 segment, Salcedo discusses her chair piece, Installation for the 8th Istanbul Biennale.
If you enjoyed this post, please spread the word by sharing this article on Facebook, Twitter, Google, etc. or leave a comment below.
Subscribe by email or RSS feed. (It’s easy, safe, and free, and you won’t have to remember to keep checking the site for new articles). You can also follow me on Twitter and Facebook or share a “like” on the Gwarlingo Facebook page.
Looking for an interesting book for yourself, your library, or your students? Check out the new Gwarlingo Store–a hand-picked selection of some of my favorite art and photography book and more. All of your purchases directly support this site.



Thank you Michelle!
I have had the fortune to see “Atrabiliarios” and “Fairytale” in “real life”, but unfortunately not Salcedo’s Istabul project – which is just fantastic! I love the way you connect the two chair projects, it really makes sense discussing them in relation to one another. The chair is also interesting as a raw material because it is (can be) very inexpensive, so that most of us have a chair around – a separate seat for one person, a place to rest -. Some of us might not own very much – except for a simple chair. Therefor the chair also become something we all can relate to, no matter our background, social status, age, gender … knowledge and/or interest for art.
Lucky you, Sigrun, to have seen both of those works in person. I’m jealous! I love your point about the chair being an inexpensive object that most people share in common, regardless of social status, age, or gender. An excellent observation. It makes me appreciate the brilliance of these works even more. Thanks for commenting.
[…] Artist Doris Salcedo: I Began to Conceive of Works Based on Nothing | gwarlingo. […]
Looking at this colossal pile: what is the value of a life…before war, during, after? In war that chair is both all you have left and something to throw on the heap. This wreckage: what was taken, and what remains to remind us, to teach us and to try us. Art out of nothing. Here is a form for all that has left. Here is a form so we have something left.
Thank you Michelle, and thank you sigrun for introducing me to Gwarlingo.
[…] Photographs by Muammer Yanmaz. (via gwarlingo) […]